What is the digital dark age and why are we living in it?
This article investigates what we can do about saving our digital heritage.
The headlines scream, "we may be creating a
digital dark age."
Even Wikipedia has a long description of what the
digital dark age.
is. Some people may call it hysteria, but we think the risk is very real.
We dive knee deep into analyzing patterns that support the theory that we are
living a period of mass heritage extinction.
Data and information is ruthlessly deleted at an exponential
rate. Once it is gone it is gone.
That is why we give a wayback link to most of the items we link to on this website.
We also believe that the reason why the issues surrounding the digital
dark ages has not been illuminated is because of the two-fold trends of the Internet.
Reason 1 - Data is being created at an exponential rate. Who would notice if
200MB of data was lost when 2000TB of data might be created by the hour.
Reason 2 - So many many more people are using computers and smartphones
and accessing the web. Literally billions of people. Would they even notice, or care,
if data from 30 years ago was not available to them?
What is digital content preservation?
Are you looking for a concise, jargon-free explanation of digital
content preservation? We looked around and in our opinion, this is
the best explanation that we could find.
I was asked recently for a concise, jargon-free explanation of digital preservation for a non-specialist audience. Here it is.
Please note that Twitter and the tweet author(s)
have not endorsed this article. The Twitter publishing platform
has provided the format and details for these tweets.
Please read Twitter's privacy and copyright policy.
The opinions expressed may not reflect the opinion of this site.
Digital loss can come in many forms. Our current focus is on the cultural loss
as formerly popular groups and message boards disappear.
Yahoo Groups is an example that springs to mind.
Yahoo is within their financial right to stop supporting mailing lists
However, with possibly over 150 million users of My Yahoo Groups,
we can only imagine what society loses when the delete button is hit.
It is true that storage costs continue to fall. Storage costs are only one part of
a very complex equation. Digital content needs to be maintained to ensure it
stays relevant and accessible. Metadata needs to be store and made available.
Constant review is required to ensure all of these datasets meet ongoing legislative
and cultural standards.
One often overlooked issue is that software packages do not always save
in a format that is 100% compliant to the relevant specification.
This could be because the software developer wanted to add a snazzy feature
to the file format appears to work in current software libraries but is
prone to future failure. Or there is an unknown bug in the file format export
function that appears to work but really is not future failure proof.
Some formats are really executable formats, like PostScript, are very
difficult to repair if the programming or file data gets corrupted.
What is software preservation?
It isn't just your cherished photos that are important to
archive. Much software that has revolutionized the way we
live our lives has been lost to future generations. We
put forward our list of critical software pieces that need
preserving. Wikipedia is currently running with the list of commercial
video games with available source code.
Microsoft Windows 1.0
- Windows is almost ubiquitous in
its market penetration and yet, the source code to the
original release seems to be lost to the public forever.
operating system source code. The codebase was rumoured to
be release in 2018 but we are still waiting for official support.
Commodore Amiga Deluxe Paint source code
- this most influential bitmap graphics program has finally been
release for the world to review and learn from.
source code archive,
giving the source code for Witchaven, Witchhaven II, William
Shatner's Tekwar, and other games.
We think that this is a classic case of digital irony.
The intelligent starting point for anyone looking for
information on the Digital Dark Ages is to browse the
The person who claimed to have created this article was Niels Elken Sønderby as shown on the
back in December 2006. The linked blog post proudly proclaims:
I don't think I can think of a topic that interests me for which I haven't been able to find an article on Wikipedia.
However, recently it happened that a topic that I've heard mentioned
independently by my brother-in-law and a colleague simply didn't exist on Wikipedia.
So I thought that my contribution to Wikipedia should be an article on the Digital Dark Age.
I hope you'll enjoy it. And be bold in editing.
Posted on Thursday 20 November 2006 by Niels Elken Sønderby
Preserving website data is more difficult that first thoughts would suggest. Let us show
you visually by providing screenshots from this blog post of a decade. The information shown here
is derived from the ever useful Wayback archives.
The first screenshot shows what the original post looks like. The page appears to
be written in Wordpress and contains no errors. By 2016, the personal blog
had fallen out of use and user's looking to read this little piece of history received
a 403 error, meaning that the blog post was not available to read.
The announcement for a new Wikipedia article was lost.
Then by 2019, the blog entry had returned. There are problems with this web page.
For starters, it is showing scripting errors (the text in black) and the reply
section is closed. Even worse, the web page has turned into an advertising page
offering Buy Cialis Professional. How this relates to the original post is
not obvious. To our eyes, this likes a case of subtle graffiti.
So what can we learn from this? For starters, it shows that the Internet is only a
temporary repository of information. Secondly, all data can get lost. And finally,
even with the original blog post data, the content management system had changed leading
to errors and making it hard to read the original announcement.
And that my friends, explains the case of how digital content degrades.
Should I print my photos?
Almost everyone in the world has a quality camera in their smartphone
and happy memories are just a click away. Before digital, people took
rolls and rolls of chemical film, made famous by the Kodak 35mm cartridge.
You would pull out your camera, say cheese, and weeks later a printed photo
would appear. Hours were spend adding photos to photo albums and browsing
fading memories. Don't forget that the photos were annotated with witty
comments and hazy explanations. But who has the time now?
In the digital age, we are constantly creating data, especially photos and
videos that we share across the world. Each photo is meta-tagged with the
time, camera settings, and geospatial information. Modern facial recognition
systems will also automatically, and accurately, tag our friends faces in
these photos. All of these digital memories take exactly zero seconds
of our time to create. A casual look back in your photo will give you
a world on detailed historical information on your life.
Stop and look a little further back and you will see that your memories
suddenly stop, or at the very least, significantly reduce in quality, quantity
and meta data. For many, that point is the date they purchased their
by Marcia Amid, quotes
on of the fathers of the Internet as saying,
If there are pictures that you really care about then creating a physical
instance is probably a good idea. Print them out, literally.